CSTE Overdose Anomaly Toolkit: Stakeholder Analysis/Partner Identification

Stakeholder Analysis/Partner Identification 

Last Updated: March 2022

Identifying stakeholders is a key element to the successful execution of an overdose response plan. Because health departments can benefit from the supplemental surveillance provided by their community and agency stakeholders, the more established the connections, the better the information will be. Additionally, when first creating a response plan in the community, there may be a list of desired stakeholders, but establishing the necessary connections may not happen immediately.  Building trust between partners may take time, and it may be a longer or more involved process to develop a fully integrated community level overdose response plan. 

Role of the Health Department

The health department (state, regional, local) will need to reexamine their role in overdose response, as it may not be the same as in emergency response. In emergency response, the health department may be the first source of the pertinent information and activates a pre-arranged response. In overdose response, the health department’s role may be to validate and confirm other sources of information, and the health department response may be delayed by hours or days compared to other front-line workers. This governance- and event-specific distinction is why it is important to have a functional network of stakeholders in the community who can provide information. 

Identifying Stakeholders

Internal stakeholders will include those who have named responsibilities in the plan (e.g., epidemiologists who are validating data), those who have accountability for the plan or its communication to the public, and anyone else within the internal agency with a “need to know.” A particular byproduct of the opioid crisis has been novel collaborations of syndromic surveillance division staff with other divisions such as Injury Prevention, Behavioral Health, Substance Abuse, and others, depending on the public health organization.  For efficient investigation and response, these internal relationships need to be sustained within the constraints of shareable information. 

External agency stakeholders will vary depending on whether a local, regional, or state health department is leading. There will be a need to either report upstream or share downstream to impacted partners. It would also be mutually beneficial to overcome traditional barriers to information sharing with public safety and law enforcement as opposed to considering these entities as community stakeholders. For example, the National Emerging Threats Initiative (NETI) has published several studies showing how drug seizure data and drug overdose data overlap at the same time points.1  Other external agency stakeholders can include EMS, healthcare and emergency departments, behavioral health providers, harm reduction services, syringe service providers and prevention organizations. 

Community stakeholders can be as broad or as narrow depending on capacity or local conditions to develop and maintain these relationships. Cultural awareness and competency are applicable at this level – inclusion of faith-based, LBGTQ+, persons who speak languages other than English, and Black, Hispanic, and Native American or other special populations when developing a communication network. Applying an equity lens to the work at this juncture can be important to the overall successful implementation of the plan being created.  

Role of Stakeholders and Partners

In addition to identifying stakeholders, it is important to identify actionable steps that may be taken in community or state during an overdose response. These actionable steps can be as simple as reminding everyone about stigma and how to destigmatize their use of language and images when discussing the event. This has been cited by clinicians, treatment specialists, and social workers as essential for mitigating the opioid epidemic at the grass roots level. The steps may include disseminating local or state hotline numbers, enhancing access to naloxone or naloxone training, and reminding the public of the signs and symptoms of overdose and Good Samaritan Laws. When working with stakeholders, media, and the public, try to identify all their actionable items, creating an easily referred to document that can be leveraged in the future when it is needed again. 

Reference

Zibbell JE, Aldridge AP, Cauchon D, DeFiore-Hyrmer J, Conway KP. Association of Law Enforcement Seizures of Heroin, Fentanyl, and Carfentanil With Opioid Overdose Deaths in Ohio, 2014-2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914666. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14666. Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1919971. PMID: 31702795; PMCID: PMC6902770. 

Toolkit Resources

Get more insights by using our toolkit resources.
Go to Resources

Glossary

Learn the definition of the key words being used.
Go to Glossary

Thanks

Thank you, to all of our contributors.
View our contributors

CSTE white logo
Using the power of epidemiology to improve
the public’s health.

Contact Us

Have any questions or recommendations, you can contact us at overdose@cste.org